Condemning the international community for exercising double standards vis-à-vis the world’s ongoing conflicts, Kuwait called for the expulsion of the Israeli delegation from the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU).

The post Kuwait calls for expulsion of Israel from IPU appeared first on News Agency nabakhabar.

In less than 20 days, the Yemeni war will enter its eighth year, a war that began on March 26, 2015, and has so far left more than 4 million displaced and hundreds of thousands killed. The Yemenis are facing the most horrific humanitarian conditions of the 21st century as a result of the Saudi coalition war. Famine and disease have spread as a result of this war, and yet the siege of Yemen by the Saudis continues.

Russia’s war against Ukraine began 11 days ago. Although no war is acceptable because civilians are the main victims of the wars, the level of the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine is never comparable to the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen. However, some Arab countries, which are either stained with the blood of the Yemenis or have remained silent in the face of the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen, have taken a human rights stand against the displaced Ukrainians.

The UAE government, which has been complicit in Saudi Arabia’s crimes against Yemen for the past seven years, has now announced that it will open its borders to Ukrainian refugees. Some Arab countries have also called on Russia and Ukraine to exercise restraint and oppose military action. This is while Yemen is a Muslim and Arabic-speaking country, and its people are among the poorest in the West Asian region.

The double standards on the war in Yemen and Ukraine is not just about the Arab countries. The United States and European countries claiming advocacy for human rights have also clearly taken double standards on these two crises. While these countries strongly condemn Russia’s war against Ukraine, and their affiliated media frequently publish pictures of Ukrainian refugees, the Saudi coalition’s seven-year war against Yemen has not even been accompanied by a resolution condemning Saudi Arabia, and fewer pictures of Yemeni refugees in their media has been published.

These double standards were even criticized in Western circles by Western personalities. According to experts, the Ukraine war has more than ever exposed the double standards of Western countries and shown how they remain silent about the killings and bloodshed in Yemen and take a racist stance on the Ukraine war.

“The United States, Britain and France and others are arming Saudi Arabia, the most authoritarian regime in the world, against Yemen,” said Richard Boyd, a member of the Irish Parliament for the European Union.

“More than 337,000 people and 10,000 children have been killed. Has any action been taken against the United States, Britain and France to arm Saudi Arabia or against Saudi Arabia itself?”

Of course, this is not the first time that these countries and their puppet regimes in West Asia have taken double standards on human rights, and it will not be the last. There is no doubt that Ukrainian refugees should be supported, but Yemeni refugees are also innocent civilians who have been victims of war and atrocities. Human rights have become a tool to pursue the interests of these countries.

The post Arab, Western countries’ double standards vis-a-vis war in Yemen, Ukraine appeared first on News Agency nabakhabar.

Robert Lloyd Schellenberg was initially given a 15-year jail term in November.

But on Monday a court increased this to the death penalty, saying the original sentence was too lenient.

The ruling is likely to worsen a diplomatic row between the countries, which has been escalating since Canada arrested an official of China’s Huawei telecoms giant last month.

China has expressed anger at the arrest of Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Huawei’s founder, on suspicion of using a subsidiary company to evade US sanctions on Iran between 2009 and 2014.

She was detained at the request of the United States.

Ms Meng, 46, denies the charges. She was granted bail shortly after her arrest, but remains under constant surveillance and must wear an electronic ankle tag.

Denying that Beijing had politicised Schellenberg’s case in response to Ms Meng’s arrest, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying urged Canada to “respect China’s judicial sovereignty”.

“The comments from the Canadian government are full of double standards,” Ms Hua said, adding: “The Canadians are the ones who have arbitrarily arrested somebody,” in an apparent reference to Ms Meng.

No sign of a thaw

Stephen McDonell, BBC News, Beijing

It’s hard to see how Canada-China relations could deteriorate any further but, given recent events, it is totally possible.

Justin Trudeau speaks of the “arbitrary” nature of the death penalty decision for Robert Shellenberg and the Chinese foreign ministry ridicules him for it, questioning whether he has read the court documents.

Ms Hua, of the foreign ministry, said: “He was involved in drug smuggling… the facts are clear; the evidence is solid.” She said that “the Canadian government should remind its citizens not to engage in drug smuggling”.

Since the Schellenberg ruling, Canada has updated its travel advice for China – urging citizens to “exercise a high degree of caution due to the risk of arbitrary enforcement of local laws”. Ms Hua responded: “China is safe as long as Canadians and others abide by Chinese laws.”

However, Beijing has also issued its own travel warning – presumably in retaliation – calling on Chinese people to “fully assess the risks of travelling to Canada”.

One way for Canada to get out of the quagmire would be to simply cave in and let Meng Wanzhou leave rather than face extradition to the US. But it has shown no indication this is even an option.

Why was Schellenberg given a death sentence?

The Canadian, who is believed to be 36, was arrested in 2014 and accused of planning to smuggle almost 500lb (227kg) of methamphetamine from China to Australia.

Schellenberg, who has previous drugs-related convictions in Canada, has denied the charges against him, saying he entered China as a tourist and was framed.

Mr Trudeau has condemned the latest ruling, saying: “It is of extreme concern to us… that China has chosen to begin to arbitrarily apply the death penalty.”

How often are foreigners executed in China?

Drug dealing is punishable by death in China, and at least a dozen foreigners have been executed for drug-related offenses. Many more are on death row.

However, the execution of Westerners is less common. One of the most high-profile cases involved British man Akmal Shaikh, who was executed in 2009 despite claims he was mentally ill and an appeal for clemency from the UK prime minister.

His family said that Shaikh had never received a mental health assessment and that judges at an appeal hearing laughed openly at Shaikh as he pleaded for his life.

Is the death penalty a political move?

China has argued that Schellenberg’s death sentence was not political.

However, some analysts have argued that both the timing, and the publicity given to Schellenberg’s retrial has been unusual.

It took a Chinese court two and a half years to hand down Schellenberg’s initial sentence of 15 years – but the retrial lasted just a day.

China also worked hard to push Schellenberg’s case to international prominence, taking the highly unusual step of inviting foreign journalists into the court, the BBC’s John Sudworth in Beijing reports.

Donald Clarke, a specialist in Chinese law at George Washington University, said that Schellenberg’s death sentence appeared to be “an unprecedented step in China’s diplomacy”.

“I have seen cases I considered unjust before, but I cannot recall a previous case that looked so clearly unconnected to the defendant’s guilt or innocence,” Prof Clarke told the BBC’s Chinese service.

Schellenberg’s lawyer, Zhang Dongshuo, told Reuters that his client’s sentence should not have been increased, because no new evidence had been presented at the retrial. He intends to appeal.

Chinese state media have reacted angrily to claims the death sentence is linked to Ms Meng’s case.

Nationalist newspaper Global Times called it “unreasonable speculation” in Western media, arguing it showed “rude contempt toward Chinese law”.

However, back in December, the editor of the Global Times had warned that China would “definitely take retaliatory measures against Canada” if Ms Meng were not released, adding: “If Canada extradites Meng to the US, China’s revenge will be far worse than detaining a Canadian.”

China was previously accused of tit-for-tat action, after it detained two other Canadian citizens in the weeks following Ms Meng’s arrest.

Former diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor face accusations of harming national security.

The post Robert Schellenberg case: China accuses Canada of ‘double standards’ appeared first on News Agency nabakhabar.